Round 10 : Liverpool FC v Juventus FC

Restricted content Forums Match Results Premiership Matches Round 10 : Liverpool FC v Juventus FC

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6859
    jamesjames
    Keymaster
      #6861
      LITNLITN
      Moderator

        Two wins so Henderson never going back to starter this means. Thanks for sim.

        #6862
        jamesjames
        Keymaster

          Two wins so Henderson never going back to starter this means. Thanks for sim.

          #6867
          LuigiLuigi
          Moderator

            This is not the lineup I had sent. I had Kante starting instead of Barella. I don’t see Kante on the bench either.

            Please refer to the email I had sent for round 9 on Aug-2nd which I requested to use again for round 10.

            #6871
            jamesjames
            Keymaster

              This is not the lineup I had sent. I had Kante starting instead of Barella. I don’t see Kante on the bench either.
              Please refer to the email I had sent for round 9 on Aug-2nd which I requested to use again for round 10.

              you posted this on Aug 4th

              so I didn’t read your other instruction, I just went to last line-up for round 9.

              #6877
              LuigiLuigi
              Moderator

                But for last lineup in round 9 Kante was in the starting lineup

                #6879
                jamesjames
                Keymaster

                  But for last lineup in round 9 Kante was in the starting lineup

                  this was the round 9 email

                  this is the attached screen shot

                  #6885
                  LuigiLuigi
                  Moderator

                    James, if you want to show an email please show it entirely not only partially. In the same email I requested Kante to start over Barella. Also look at round 9 game link which was simmed by Zizou, he had Kante starting: https://www.dynastyliga.com/forums/topic/round-9-manchester-united-v-juventus/

                    I would have shrugged it off but at least admit the mistake.

                    #6886
                    jamesjames
                    Keymaster

                      when you send in your line-up like this, you’re just asking for this to happen.

                      I simmed 15 matches (out of 21) this round so I probably put in 7+ hours simming. And I sent in my line-ups, which I do every round.
                      Do you think it’s fair to me that I should have to look at 3 different places (last round result, your post on the line-up call, and your email (which contains 3 emails) to figure out what your line-up and instructions are?
                      How many more minutes would it have taken you send in a line-up with clear player choices and clear instructions?
                      this email was from aug 2, and on aug 4 you posted to “use the same line-up as last round”. I disregard everything else and used the line-up and screen shot as is at the bottom of the email.
                      If Z thinks it’s fair to me and your opponent (who sent in a clear line-up) that this match should be re-simmed, I’ll do it.

                      • This reply was modified 2 years, 8 months ago by jamesjames.
                      #6888
                      ProPAINProPAIN
                      Moderator

                        James, if you want to show an email please show it entirely not only partially. In the same email I requested Kante to start over Barella. Also look at round 9 game link which was simmed by Zizou, he had Kante starting: https://www.dynastyliga.com/forums/topic/round-9-manchester-united-v-juventus/

                        I would have shrugged it off but at least admit the mistake.

                        In the time it took you to type out the email on August 2nd saying to replace Barella with Kanté, you could’ve copied the lineup submission, made the changes and sent a new email. I do this every single round and it takes me literally 10 seconds (no, I’m not exaggerating) to submit a lineup. 30 seconds to a minute if I have an injury and I need to make some changes.

                        I would mind my own business but james has been simming most of the matches for quite a while now, the least we all can do is help him out a bit with clear instructions. We all have busy lives, but this takes a couple of minutes every few weeks.

                        #6889
                        LuigiLuigi
                        Moderator

                          when you send in your line-up like this, you’re just asking for this to happen.

                          I simmed 15 matches (out of 21) this round so I probably put in 7+ hours simming. And I sent in my line-ups, which I do every round.
                          Do you think it’s fair to me that I should have to look at 3 different places (last round result, your post on the line-up call, and your email (which contains 3 emails) to figure out what your line-up and instructions are?
                          How many more minutes would it have taken you send in a line-up with clear player choices and clear instructions?
                          this email was from aug 2, and on aug 4 you posted to “use the same line-up as last round”. I disregard everything else and used the line-up and screen shot as is at the bottom of the email.
                          If Z thinks it’s fair to me and your opponent (who sent in a clear line-up) that this match should be re-simmed, I’ll do it.

                          You didn’t have to look in 3 different places. You only had to look at the email of round 9.

                          If things are missed because I know my instructions were not clear I just move on and don’t even complain. For this one round 9 properly captured the change. When we submit lineups we don’t know who’s going to sim so my assumption was that the same lineup was going to be used.

                          The time and effort you put is appreciated, if a miss happens once over 100 games that’s pretty darn good already so I won’t hold any grudge against. But for this one I don’t expect to be blamed for it. Could I have re-posted the lineup entirely to make it crystal clear? Yes I could but it’s not the first time I send changes requests like this and they’ve been generally accepted and implemented.

                          #6890
                          eviloevilo
                          Moderator

                            Luigi you know I love you man and I have no horse here. But james made a very honest sim here because of your lack of clarity. And he sims for hours so blaming him is a bit too much.
                            Now if you ask for a resim because your instructions weren’t clear I’d say nothing. But don’t blame the simmer here.

                            #6891
                            LuigiLuigi
                            Moderator

                              Look guys, first I never asked for a re-sim, yet.

                              I want to understand why for the same instructions I sent, first time was deemed clear enough but not the following round.

                              To my knowledge whether a re-sim is to be done or not doesn’t go to who got the ‘clearer’ instructions. That would be ridiculous. I mean all I asked is take a lineup and replace one guy with another. If that’s judged not to be clear enough I may be wasting my time here.

                            Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                            Dynasty Liga

                            Season 23