Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Unfortunately I will have to step out.
I must admit I haven’t been a good owner the past 2 years. I have prepared my list for free agency but my life with 3 young kids + very demanding job + coaching is not allowing me put the necessary effort to enjoy this great league. It saddens me because there are so many kids I picked up which I’m excited to see how they grow for me.
I may come back in a few years. It’s been a blast for me since I joined. Thanks for everyone making this league what it is. The quality of owners have increased year after year.
Good luck everyone. Maybe now Evilo might be able to get Cherki 😉
All I have to say is that the greatest player of all time finally got his World Cup. Well overdue.
Was trying to pull a trade for him but this is massive. Congrats both.
I’m convinced Zizou hacked my FA list file
Sorry I’m on a trip with the family, just got time now.
Juve (CFMTL/U21) bid 6m on Fabio Miretti from Juve (29/3)
Juve (Cfmtl) release Killian Sardella
Look guys, first I never asked for a re-sim, yet.
I want to understand why for the same instructions I sent, first time was deemed clear enough but not the following round.
To my knowledge whether a re-sim is to be done or not doesn’t go to who got the ‘clearer’ instructions. That would be ridiculous. I mean all I asked is take a lineup and replace one guy with another. If that’s judged not to be clear enough I may be wasting my time here.
when you send in your line-up like this, you’re just asking for this to happen.
I simmed 15 matches (out of 21) this round so I probably put in 7+ hours simming. And I sent in my line-ups, which I do every round.
Do you think it’s fair to me that I should have to look at 3 different places (last round result, your post on the line-up call, and your email (which contains 3 emails) to figure out what your line-up and instructions are?
How many more minutes would it have taken you send in a line-up with clear player choices and clear instructions?
this email was from aug 2, and on aug 4 you posted to “use the same line-up as last round”. I disregard everything else and used the line-up and screen shot as is at the bottom of the email.
If Z thinks it’s fair to me and your opponent (who sent in a clear line-up) that this match should be re-simmed, I’ll do it.You didn’t have to look in 3 different places. You only had to look at the email of round 9.
If things are missed because I know my instructions were not clear I just move on and don’t even complain. For this one round 9 properly captured the change. When we submit lineups we don’t know who’s going to sim so my assumption was that the same lineup was going to be used.
The time and effort you put is appreciated, if a miss happens once over 100 games that’s pretty darn good already so I won’t hold any grudge against. But for this one I don’t expect to be blamed for it. Could I have re-posted the lineup entirely to make it crystal clear? Yes I could but it’s not the first time I send changes requests like this and they’ve been generally accepted and implemented.
James, if you want to show an email please show it entirely not only partially. In the same email I requested Kante to start over Barella. Also look at round 9 game link which was simmed by Zizou, he had Kante starting: https://www.dynastyliga.com/forums/topic/round-9-manchester-united-v-juventus/
I would have shrugged it off but at least admit the mistake.
But for last lineup in round 9 Kante was in the starting lineup
Despite the good team on paper, Parma refuses to win this season.
This is not the lineup I had sent. I had Kante starting instead of Barella. I don’t see Kante on the bench either.
Please refer to the email I had sent for round 9 on Aug-2nd which I requested to use again for round 10.
Please use the same tacs and lineups as round 9 for my 3 teams.
Thank you
C’com what’s up with all those injuries this season 😒
So Curt is out?
Welcome LITN
-
AuthorPosts